XGRO (iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio) is a Canadian mutual fund trust listed on the TSX. Practitioners commonly treat such trusts as corporations for US purposes, and a fund holding an 80/20 equity-and-bond ETF portfolio of iShares funds then meets a §1297 test; confirm that classification and the account it sits in — TFSA, RRSP or non-registered — before filing Form 8621.
The elections available to you — QEF, mark-to-market, or the §1291 default — turn on details worth checking before you file.
No card · free draft · professional per-form preparation starts at $170 per Form 8621 (Bright!Tax’s published floor, no distributions); the PFIC package is a flat $499 for up to 25 Forms 8621, which you review and file.
If XGRO is confirmed as a PFIC, you may need a separate Form 8621. For supported inputs the paid package gives a Form 8621 for each supported PFIC — a pre-filled official PDF only for a tax year whose official form is integrated and released, otherwise a worksheet with every figure mapped to the form's lines; review its notes and complete any remaining fields before filing outside Atamatax.
QEF, mark-to-market (§1296), or the default §1291 — surfaced per holding for you to confirm, never auto-decided.
When the default regime applies, gains can be allocated across the holding period and carry an interest charge. A valid, timely election can change future treatment, but availability and transition rules matter.
XGRO adds a 20% fixed-income sleeve to XEQT's four equity holdings. The equity side is the same mix of US-listed (ITOT, IEMG) and Canadian-listed (XIC, XEF) iShares ETFs; the bond side is held through iShares bond ETFs on both sides of the border, with XBB carrying the Canadian universe-bond exposure. As with every fund on this page, XGRO is itself a Canadian mutual fund trust and is analysed as a PFIC first.
Under §1298(a)(2) the look-through stops at any US-domiciled sleeve, because a US ETF is a regulated investment company and cannot be a PFIC. So XGRO's lower-tier PFIC exposure is confined to its Canadian-listed holdings — the Canadian equity and developed-markets sleeves plus the Canadian bond ETF — rather than to every fund inside it, which is the structural difference from VGRO, where all seven sleeves are Canadian trusts.
The bond sleeve's interest reaches you inside an XGRO distribution and is tested as one figure under §1291, with none of the character the T3 assigns to it. BlackRock Canada publishes PFIC Annual Information Statements for its iShares ETFs, so a QEF election can be made for XGRO and for the Canadian sleeves beneath it; the US-listed sleeves need no election because they are not PFICs.
Where XGRO sits among its siblings: XBAL is the same build at 60/40; VGRO is the Vanguard 80/20, with all seven sleeves Canadian-listed. The target allocation here is 80% equity / 20% fixed income; the vehicles underneath are XIC, XEF, XBB (Canadian-listed) · ITOT, IEMG (US-listed). The issuer's own fund page is the source for both, last read on 2026-09-05; weights, fees and yields change and are deliberately not quoted here.
BlackRock Canada publishes PFIC Annual Information Statements for its iShares ETFs after year end — the document a §1295 QEF election needs. How a QEF election uses it
XGRO is organised as a Canadian mutual fund trust, listed on the TSX, and it reports to you on Canadian slips — a T3 for its distributions, a T5008 when you sell — none of which the IRS reads. The PFIC test in §1297 asks about a foreign corporation's passive income and assets; a trust is analysed that way only once it is classified as a corporation for US tax, and that classification is the position practitioners commonly take for a Canadian ETF. Confirm it for XGRO before choosing an election, because everything below assumes it.
On that footing XGRO behaves like any other foreign pooled fund under the default §1291 regime: a sale allocates the gain rateably across your holding period, each earlier year's slice is taxed at that year's highest ordinary rate, and interest runs on the deferred tax. Its distributions — the T3 breaks them into Canadian dividends, foreign income, capital gains and return of capital — are tested as one figure against 125% of the prior three-year average, and Canada's own characterisation of each slice does not carry over. XGRO is a fund of funds in which 3 of 5 underlying ETFs are Canadian-listed; only those can be lower-tier PFICs under §1298(a)(2), because the US-listed sleeves are regulated investment companies rather than foreign corporations.
The account decides the rest. Inside an RRSP or RRIF the treaty deferral, automatic since Rev. Proc. 2014-55, means XGRO generates no annual PFIC consequences while the deferral holds. Inside a TFSA, an FHSA, an RESP or a plain account there is no deferral, the Canadian tax exemption is invisible to the IRS, and XGRO is analysed each year on its own. The same ticker is a non-event in one account and a Form 8621 in the next.
The QEF route for XGRO depends on BlackRock/iShares issuing a PFIC Annual Information Statement covering the year — the ordinary-income-and-capital-gain breakdown §1295 requires. Ask for it in writing before you file rather than after: a QEF election made without the statement to support it is not one you want to be defending later.
XGRO is the iShares Core Growth ETF Portfolio. Match the ticker — and the ISIN, where your statement shows one — to this line before reading the mechanics above as yours.
Two other bond funds in this registry raise the same question as XGRO: VGRO and VBAL. The analysis does not change from one issuer to the next, and each fund is its own PFIC — its own Form 8621, holding period and election history. What does change is the issuer's paperwork: whether it publishes a PFIC Annual Information Statement for the fund.
From one fund to the whole case
Four questions — how many funds, for how long, whether Forms 8621 were ever filed, whether the returns are current — and a route into the preparation that fits, with what it costs. Nothing you answer leaves this page.
Free, no account, nothing you answer leaves this page. Open the full portfolio scanner
A routing read, not a determination. Whether a fund is a PFIC, whether an exception applies and what a prior year needs are established when the holdings are screened; the route above says where that happens and what it costs.
This is a screening assessment based on published vehicle facts and the statutory tests—not a classification based on domicile alone, and not individualized tax, legal, or investment advice — see our methodology (IRC §1297 et seq.). Confirm your specific situation with a licensed professional.
Primary sources (Cornell Legal Information Institute for the US Code and CFR; IRS.gov for forms, procedures, and treaty documents). This page is general information, not individualized tax or legal advice.
Read next
Other Canadian ETFs